So, I know you read the New York Times article, 6 Food Mistakes Parents Make. Whenever I read an article like this, I think, “Hey, I should comment on this article.” Then I think, “Wait, why does anyone care what I think about this article?” Then I think, “Hey, I have a blog. Posting my opinion, asked for or not, is what it’s all about.” By that time several days have gone by and it’s too late. What is the opposite of intrepid reporting?
But last night Laurie had an insight about this part of the article:
> **Giving up too soon.** Ms. Worobey said she has often heard parents say, “My kid would never eat that.†While it may be true right now, she noted that eating preferences often change. So parents should keep preparing a variety of healthful foods and putting them on the table, even if a child refuses to take a bite. In young children, it may take 10 or more attempts over several months to introduce a food.
I’ve criticized this advice before on the basis that it doesn’t work: you can’t mold your children’s tastes, and I’ve served Brussels sprouts dozens and dozens of times (and will again tonight) and Iris just doesn’t like them. Which is fine.
That’s not the problem, though. The problem is, *it doesn’t make any sense.* I don’t serve Brussels sprouts regularly because I want to make Iris like them. I serve them because Laurie and I like them. “Don’t give up too soon,” says the article, but what does “giving up” mean? Not serving Brussels sprouts any more? Serving them but telling Iris she can’t have any?
“They should just say, ‘Serve food you like,'” said Laurie. I agree.